REVENGE (2017)

HELL HATH NO FURY LIKE A WOMAN LEFT FOR DEAD

HD settings private access unlock
🎬 MORE FILMS LIKE THIS
IMDb Rating: 6.4
Jen is enjoying a romantic getaway with her wealthy, married boyfriend at a secluded desert villa. After a brutal betrayal, she is left for dead in the blistering heat. Surviving against all odds, she transforms into a mythic, unstoppable force of vengeance.
DirectorCoralie Fargeat
GenreFeminist Revenge • Neon Horror • Extreme Thriller
Year2017
Runtime108 minutes
StarsMatilda Lutz, Kevin Janssens

The Neon Resurrection: Coralie Fargeat’s Visceral Debut

When Revenge (2017) exploded onto the festival circuit, it instantly established Coralie Fargeat as one of the most exciting new voices in extreme cinema. With aggressive neon aesthetics, razor-sharp direction, and unapologetic confidence, Fargeat takes the tired rape-and-revenge subgenre and transforms it into a mythic, operatic, and strangely empowering spectacle of female rage.

Jen (Matilda Lutz), a young woman accompanying her wealthy married lover to a remote desert villa, becomes the victim of a brutal betrayal. Left for dead and impaled on a cactus in the scorching Moroccan sun, she refuses to perish. Through pain, survival, and primal transformation, she emerges as something almost supernatural — a relentless, blood-soaked avenger painted in electric crimson.

Hip-Hop Montage and Sensory Assault

Fargeat deliberately weaponizes the camera. The first act exaggerates the male gaze to grotesque levels. After the assault, the perspective shifts violently. The lens now stalks the men with predatory hunger. The desert becomes both womb and battlefield. The pristine white villa is slowly transformed into a dripping red slaughterhouse — the men’s own space of privilege turned into their tomb.

💎 Diamond Tip: 5,000 Liters of Neon Blood

Very few viewers know that the production used over 5,000 liters of specially formulated synthetic blood, color-graded to an unnatural, almost comic-book neon red. This was a conscious artistic decision to push the film away from realism and into mythic symbolism. The blood becomes the visual language of purification and female rage. Combined with practical prosthetics and almost no CGI, this commitment to tangible, excessive gore is what makes Revenge so unforgettable and physically nauseating.

Why This Film Belongs in the Archive

Revenge is one of the most important genre films of the 2010s. It proves that extreme cinema can be both politically intelligent and visually breathtaking. Fargeat doesn’t ask for sympathy — she demands awe. The film rejects victimhood and instead offers a cathartic fantasy of total, uncompromising retribution.

Matilda Lutz delivers a star-making, almost entirely physical performance. Kevin Janssens is terrifying as the main antagonist — his smug entitlement slowly dissolving into animalistic terror. From the opening drone shots over the desert to the final blood-drenched showdown, every frame is deliberate.

We curate and embed this modern classic in its full uncut form because it belongs in any serious archive of extreme, feminist, and visually revolutionary cinema.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Revenge (2017) a remake?

No. It is an original story written and directed by Coralie Fargeat. The film deliberately deconstructs and subverts the classic rape-and-revenge genre tropes.

Why is the film so visually striking?

Fargeat used hyper-saturated neon colors, over 5,000 liters of custom synthetic blood, and practical effects to create a mythic, comic-book-like aesthetic rather than gritty realism.

Is Revenge considered a feminist film?

Yes. It is widely regarded as a powerful feminist reclamation of the exploitation genre, shifting the narrative from the male gaze to female rage, rebirth, and total agency.

How practical were the gore effects?

Almost entirely practical. The production used massive amounts of synthetic blood, custom prosthetics, and minimal CGI. The infamous cactus impalement scene was created with 30 silicone spines and specialized sound design.

Are the video files hosted on this website?

No. Sharing The Sickness is an information location tool operating under 17 U.S.C. §512(d). We do not host, store, upload, or transmit any video content. All videos are embedded from independent third-party platforms.